The Greatest Showman, A Film

Image result for image of greatest showman

Who doesn’t love Hugh Jackman?  He plays the character of P T Barnum who once said,

” There is a sucker born every minute. ”

That quirky side of Barnum is not really addressed in his making people happy by unimaginable sights. The themes  included are  following your dreams, hard work,imagination, love, and family.

The music and dancing are toe tapping and infectious.

A current theme of accepting others no matter how different they are was very clear in the circus family. One character announced that even her mother had not  accepted her the way she  was loved by her new community.

The setting is New York City during the Victorian era and times were tough for many of the working class. The Circus was a good diversion for visitors or people in the street.

I took my grandchildren who are 12 and almost 8 and a good time was  had by all. The rating is PG and suitable for children in my opinion.

One story attributed to Barnum  was  how  he found a former slave who was 160 years old.  She entertained the crowds  with stories of George Washington and other historical figures.  Some of the audience believed her , suspending reality.  Others didn’t . Seems that most of us could use more laughter and happiness in our lives. Don’t you ?

The last scene in the film is a magical moment of P T Barnum, finally !

I would give this film a 3.5 * out of 5*.

Posted in film, Uncategorized, USA | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Winston Churchill . . . .A Connection 70 Years Later

Image result for churchill image in the tube

Here is one of my favorite scenes  from the film, The Darkest Hour about the political climate in Britain early in World War II.  Winston Churchill is the new Prime Minister who faces the distinct possibility of  the total  destruction of the British troops at Dunkirk or negotiating peace, actually  facing  defeat to Hitler through   discussions with Mussolini. Much of the film is shot in the War Room and governing chamber of Westminster with persuasive dialogue  between the “doves” lead by former  Prime Minister Chamberlain and the “hawks” lead by Churchill.  The scene before this shot on “the tube” shows Churchill in his car , commenting that he has never in his life ridden on a bus.  He jumps out of his chauffeured driven car and enters the  tube, the London subway. The ordinary Brits’ facial expressions and body language changes from disbelief , wonder to joy as they interact with the Prime Minster. As Mr. Churchill wandered from person to groups, grabbing to stay on his feet,  he asks their opinion of the war.  The “V” for victory flashed through the  crowd with  cheers encouraging the  Prime Minister to carry on for complete victory , not surrender. These are the blue collar, working class people who bore the suffering of war with their sons fighting and dying, as well as  abject poverty and shortage of food and supplies.  But they supported Churchill , his stand and encouraged him to press on without surrender.

There is no  research that this tube ride with the masses actually took place.  Of course the Churchill  “V” for victory is proved with many images and his committed  victory speeches.   And of course, it was the masses who responded to Churchill’s call to sail  to the population of Britain to sail private  boats to Dunkirk for the emergency evacuation of the British and Belgian forces.  Such a moving scene in both films of the small  private armada of yachts and  fishing vessels as the British  sail onto the horizon after being inspired by their Prime Minister’s call  to sail and  bring home their boys!

Well, you might wonder where I am going with this.  How can there be a connection  this the story of PM Churchill and today?  Thank about it. . . someone who is upper class  , educated, and very rich connecting with the masses.  Yes, I am thinking about our President Trump.  Now I am not endorsing all  of what Mr. Trump does or says, though I agree with with much of what he has done as president but little of what he says or how he says it.  That is  a topic for a future blog, maybe !    Just think  about his ability to communicate with the masses. . . . the blue collar working public in-spite of their extreme wealth. Mr. Churchill and Mr. Trump did and can do that very well.   They gave and give a voice to the voiceless.  I am not sure how Churchill connected to the people in such a similar way but it seems to me that Mr. Trump’s outgoing personality and daily contact with the various tradesmen in his construction business gave him a splendid opportunity to speak  and understand as one of the guys!

For me this is one of the purposes of films.  to make learning connections, learn about  history ,and human nature.  I would love it to hear about your experiences in  this aspects of watching film. Do you agree with my connection or not?   Why or why not?

This summer on  our WW II trip to England and France, my children and their families visited The War Rooms in London where much of this film is set.  I didn’t and I wish I had!    But this film made it come alive.

Posted in film, Travel, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

New Facts on the Sinking of the Titanic

Image result for image of Titanic

Very interesting  even if  it is half true!  Power and money seem always to be the route of all evil!

Posted in film, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Coins Left at a Departed Soldier’s Grave

Image result for tradition of leaving money on the stone of a military man

Mementos have been found  for the dead  left by the living since the  earliest graves were discovered.  From the simplest graves of the masses  to the  those for kings, items are left for use in the afterlife such a pottery, beads and weapons.

The mythology of the Greeks describe coins placed in the mouth of the dead for the payment to Charon, the ferryman,  for passage over the river after death.

It has long been a Jewish tradition when vising a loved one to leave a small stone or a small pile of stones on the tombstone. Flowers are perishable but  stones are not.  

This is a video of the stone rubbing my family did of the stone and also rubbing sand from Omaha Beach for photos .


My grandson, Henry, beautifully  played Taps. He is standing before the wall of the missing in front of Glen Miller’s name. The big band director is a favorite of his. You can see that without the sand rubbed into the engraving, the writing on the marble wall  is impossible to read.

If you are going to a cemetery, take some pennies to place on a soldier’s stone.  This simply act will tell the family that their loved ones is not forgotten but honored for his/her service.



Posted in service, Uncategorized, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Atonement, a Film Review

Image result for images from film Atonement

This green dress image is memorable. . . the color, the style, the elegance.. . . the passion.

I discovered this British period  film based on Ian Mc Ewan’s book of  a wealthy British family set at their  countryside estate circa 1935.  The story continues  through scenes of the World War II battle for  Dunkirk  to the closing of the 20th century. Karen Knightly and James McAvoy have strong chemistry that easily  lasts throughout the lengthy story.

The film was released in 2007 but I found it on the TV Fire Stick last night and was held  spellbound. Not only is it visually strong  with  the wide slow-shots , it touches a place of reality in the themes. Love, lies, sex, class and the  power of words. Briony, Keira’s younger jealous sister utters a lie that changes all their lives forever.

If you have either seen the play Doubt or the film of the same name, you might agree with me  in that  there is a  similarity between these  two.  Doubt is the feeling  we  have is to whether something is the truth , or is just a mistake or did it mean something else.  It is a startling realization.  We are usually committed that something is true if we see  it with our eyes. Is it though?   I am reminded in that the police says witnesses  rarely give  the same account of an accident, though both were there.

Atonement begins and ends with words and the power they hold over life. . . true  . . .   mistaken or . . . . lies.

Proverbs 18:21 (NIV) The tongue has the power of life and death, and those who love it will eat its fruit

Posted in film, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Will Indian Immigration to the United States Increase?

Indian Immigrants in the United States
Indian college student applying henna.

A college student applies henna, the Indian tradition of painting elaborate designs on the skin. (Photo: University of Illinois Springfield)

Immigrants from India first arrived in the United States in small numbers during the early 19th century, primarily as low-skilled farm laborers. In recent decades the population has grown substantially, with 2.4 million Indian immigrants resident in the United States as of 2015. This makes the foreign born from India the second-largest immigrant group after Mexicans, accounting for almost 6 percent of the 43.3 million foreign-born population.

In 1960, just 12,000 Indian immigrants lived in the United States, representing less than 0.5 percent of the 9.7 million overall immigrant population. Migration from India swelled between 1965 and 1990 as a series of legislative changes removed national-origin quotas, introduced temporary skilled worker programs, and created employment-based permanent visas. In 2016, Indians were the top recipients of high-skilled H-1B temporary visas and were the second-largest group of international students in the United States.

Today, the majority of Indian immigrants are young and highly educated, and have strong English skills. Many work in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. From 1980 to 2010, the population grew more than eleven-fold, roughly doubling every decade (see Figure 1). In 2013, India and China supplanted Mexico as the top sources of newly arriving immigrants in the United States.

Figure 1. Indian Immigrant Population in the United States, 1980-2015

Sources: Data from U.S. Census Bureau 2010 and 2015 American Community Surveys (ACS), and 1980, 1990, and 2000 Decennial Census.

The United States is the third most popular destination for Indian migrants worldwide, after the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan, according to mid-2015 estimates by the United Nations Population Division. Other top destinations include Saudi Arabia (1,894,000), Kuwait (1,062,000), Oman (778,000), and the United Kingdom (777,000).

Click here to view an interactive map showing where migrants from India and other countries have settled worldwide.
Compared with the overall foreign- and native-born populations, immigrants from India on average are significantly better educated, more likely to be employed in management positions, and have higher household incomes. In fiscal year (FY) 2015, nearly half of Indians who obtained lawful permanent residence in the United States (also known as receiving a green card) did so through employer sponsorship. The remainder qualified as immediate relatives of U.S. citizens or through other family-sponsored channels.

Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau (the most recent 2015 American Community Survey [ACS] and pooled 2011-15 ACS data), the Department of Homeland Security’s Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, and the World Bank’s annual remittance data, this Spotlight provides information on the Indian immigrant population in the United States, focusing on its size, geographic distribution, and socioeconomic characteristics.

Click on the bullet points below for more information:


The U.S. Census Bureau defines the foreign born as individuals who had no U.S. citizenship at birth. The foreign-born population includes naturalized citizens, lawful permanent residents, refugees and asylees, legal nonimmigrants (including those on student, work, or other temporary visas), and persons residing in the country without authorization.

The terms foreign born and immigrant are used interchangeably and refer to those who were born in another country and later emigrated to the United States.

Distribution by State and Key Cities

In 2011-15, more than half of immigrants from India resided in five states: California (20 percent), New Jersey (11 percent), Texas (9 percent), New York, and Illinois (7 percent each). The top four destination counties were Santa Clara County in California, Middlesex County in New Jersey, Cook County in Illinois, and Alameda County in California. Together, these four counties accounted for about 15 percent of the total Indian population in the United States.

Figure 2. Top Destination States for Indian Immigrants in the United States, 2011-15

Note: Pooled 2011-15 ACS data were used to get statistically valid estimates at the state level for smaller-population geographies. Not shown are populations in Alaska and Hawaii, which are small in size; for details, visit the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) Data Hub for an interactive map showing geographic distribution of immigrants by state and county, available online.
Source: MPI tabulation of data from U.S. Census Bureau pooled 2011-15 ACS.

Click here for an interactive map that shows the geographic distribution of immigrants by state and county. Select India or another country from the dropdown menu to see which states and counties have the most Indian immigrants.

As of 2011-15, the metropolitan areas with the most Indian immigrants were the greater New York, Chicago, San Jose, and San Francisco areas. These four metro areas were home to one-third of Indians in the United States.

Figure 3. Top Metropolitan Destinations for Indian Immigrants in the United States, 2011-15

Note: Pooled 2011-15 ACS data were used to get statistically valid estimates at the metropolitan statistical-area level for smaller-population geographies.
Source: MPI tabulation of data from U.S. Census Bureau pooled 2011-15 ACS.

Table 1. Top Concentrations by Metropolitan Area for Immigrants from India, 2011-15

Source: MPI tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau pooled 2011-15 ACS.

Click here for an interactive map showing the concentration of immigrants by metropolitan area. Select India or another origin country from the dropdown menu to see which metro areas have the most immigrants.

English Proficiency

Though they come from diverse linguistic backgrounds, immigrants from India were more likely to be proficient in English than the overall foreign-born population. In 2015, just 26 percent of Indian immigrants (ages 5 and over) reported limited English proficiency, compared to 49 percent of the total foreign-born population.

Approximately 11 percent of Indian immigrants spoke only English at home (versus 16 percent of all immigrants), while the rest spoke a variety of languages, including Hindi (25 percent), Telugu (13 percent), Guajarati (12 percent), Tamil (9 percent), and Punjabi (8 percent).

Note: Limited English proficiency refers to those who indicated on the ACS questionnaire that they spoke English less than “very well.”

Age, Education, and Employment

The median age for Indian immigrants was 39 years, younger than the overall foreign-born population (44 years) and older than the U.S. born (36 years).

Both Indians and the overall immigrant population were much more likely than the native born to be of working age. In 2015, 82 percent of Indian immigrants were between ages 18 and 64, compared to 60 percent of the U.S. born (see Figure 4).

Figure 4. Age Distribution of the U.S. Population by Origin, 2015

Note: Numbers may not add up to 100 as they are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Source: MPI tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2015 ACS.

Click here to view an interactive chart showing the age and sex distribution of top origin groups, including the Indian born.
Overall, Indian immigrants have much higher educational attainment compared to the foreign- and U.S.-born populations. In 2015, 77 percent of Indian adults (ages 25 and over) had a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to 29 percent of all immigrants and 31 percent of native-born adults. Notably, among college-educated Indian immigrants, more than half had an advanced degree.

The high educational attainment of Indian immigrants is a result of the specific channels they use to enter the United States. Many Indians arrived either as international students or H-1B workers, to fill jobs that usually require a university degree, and often stay to pursue permanent residence. Indian citizens were the top recipients of H-1B visas, accounting for 74 percent of the 345,000 petitions (initial and for continuing employment) approved by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in FY 2016.

Nearly 166,000 Indian immigrants were enrolled in U.S. higher education institutions in the 2015-16 school year, comprising 16 percent of the 1 million international students overall. Students from India were the second-largest foreign group after Chinese (328,000), according to the Institute of International Education. Approximately 80 percent of Indian immigrant students were enrolled in STEM majors. Students from India accounted for 14 percent of all temporary visa holders earning doctorates at U.S. colleges and universities in 2015, 85 percent of whom intended to stay in the United States after receiving their degrees, according to the Survey of Earned Doctorates.

The foreign born from India participated in the labor force at a slightly higher rate than the overall immigrant and native-born populations. In 2015, about 68 percent of Indian immigrants ages 16 and over were in the civilian labor force, compared to 66 percent and 62 percent of the foreign- and native-born populations, respectively. Indian immigrants were roughly twice as likely to be employed in management, business, science, and arts occupations, at 73 percent, compared to the overall foreign- and native-born populations, at 31 percent and 38 percent, respectively.

Figure 5. Employed Workers in the Civilian Labor Force (ages 16 and older) by Occupation and Origin, 2015

Source: MPI tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau 2015 ACS.

Income and Poverty

The median household income for Indian immigrants in 2015 was much higher than that of the overall foreign- and native-born populations. Households headed by Indian immigrants had a median income of $107,000, compared to $51,000 and $56,000 for overall immigrant and native-born households, respectively.

Just 7 percent of Indian immigrants lived in poverty in 2015, a much lower rate than the foreign-born population overall and the U.S. born (17 percent and 14 percent, respectively).

Immigration Pathways and Naturalization

In 2015, 45 percent of the 2.4 million Indian immigrants in the United States were naturalized U.S. citizens, compared to 48 percent of the overall foreign-born population.

Indians are more likely to have arrived in the United States recently, compared to immigrants overall. Thirty-one percent of Indian immigrants arrived in 2010 or later, versus 16 percent of the total foreign-born population. Another 31 percent arrived between 2000 and 2009, and 38 percent before 2000 (see Figure 6).

Figure 6. Indian Immigrants and All Immigrants in the United States by Period of Arrival, 2015

Source: MPI tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau 2015 ACS. Numbers may not add up to 100 as they are rounded to the nearest whole number.

After Mexico and China, India was the third largest country of origin for new lawful permanent residents (LPRs) in FY 2015. More than 64,000 new LPRs, 6 percent of the 1,051,000 total, were from India. Indians who obtained green cards were much more likely to use employment-based preferences than new LPRs overall: Forty-three percent compared to 14 percent, respectively (see Figure 6). Meanwhile, Indian immigrants were less likely than new LPRs overall to obtain green cards as immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (32 percent, compared to 44 percent).

Notably, there were significant backlogs for Indian citizens applying for LPR status through employment-based and family-sponsored channels, due to the annual per-country quota of immigrant visas available for these categories. According to the most recent visa issuance data, in August 2017 the State Department was processing visa applications filed by Indians in September 2003 for some family and employment preferences.

Figure 7. Immigration Pathways of Indian Immigrants and All Immigrants in the United States, 2015

Notes: Family-sponsored: Includes adult children and siblings of U.S. citizens as well as spouses and children of green-card holders. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens: Includes spouses, minor children, and parents of U.S. citizens. Diversity Visa Lottery: The Immigration Act of 1990 established the Diversity Visa Lottery to allow entry to immigrants from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. The law states that 55,000 diversity visas in total are made available each fiscal year. Indians are not eligible for the lottery.
Source: MPI tabulation of data from Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 2015 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics (Washington, DC: DHS Office of Immigration Statistics, 2016), available online.

Although the vast majority of Indian immigrants in the United States are legally present, there were approximately 267,000 unauthorized Indian immigrants in the 2010-14 period, according to Migration Policy Institute (MPI) estimates, comprising less than 3 percent of the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the United States.

MPI also estimated that, in 2016, approximately 15,000 Indian youth were immediately eligible for the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. However, as of March 31, 2017 (the latest data available from the U.S. government), just 3,741 Indian youth had applied for the DACA program, and 3,182 had been approved.

Health Coverage

Indian immigrants were much more likely to have private health insurance than both the overall foreign- and native-born populations (83 percent compared to 55 percent and 69 percent, respectively). They were also less likely to be covered by public health insurance programs and to be uninsured than immigrants overall and the U.S. born.

Figure 8. Health Coverage for Indian Immigrants, All Immigrants, and the Native Born, 2015

Note: The sum of shares by type of insurance is likely to be greater than 100 because people may have more than one type of insurance.
Source: MPI tabulation of data from the U.S. Census Bureau 2015 ACS.


The Indian diaspora in the United States is comprised of approximately 3.9 million individuals who were either born in India or reported Indian ancestry or race, according to tabulations from the U.S. Census Bureau pooled 2011-15 ACS.

Click here to read an in-depth profile of the Indian diaspora in the United States.


While remaining the world’s top recipient of remittances, India experienced a decline in remittance inflows in 2016 for a second consecutive year. Global remittances sent to India via formal channels fell to approximately $63 billion in 2016, a 9 percent decrease from $69 billion in 2015, according to data from the World Bank. The drop owes to low oil prices and weak economic growth in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, where millions of Indian migrants work on temporary contracts. Remittances represented less than 3 percent of India’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2015. However, at the Indian state level, dependence on remittances varies substantially. For instance, remittances account for an estimated 36 percent of net domestic product in Kerala, and contribute significantly to household consumption.

Figure 9. Annual Remittance Flows to India, 1975 to 2016

Note: The 2016 figure represents World Bank estimates.
Source: MPI tabulations of data from the World Bank Prospects Group, “Annual Remittances Data,” April 2017 update.


Posted in India, Travel, Uncategorized, USA | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri A Film Review

I decided to reblog my review after this raw film won three of the top awards at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, Best Actress, Frances McDormand, Best Supporting Actor Sam Rockwell and, the top prize of Best Film. If you enjoy clear writing and quick dialogue, recognizable characters and experiential life development, you won’t be disappointed
* * * * * An enthusiastic five star endorsement.


ThrImage result for image of film three billboards outside of Ebbing MissouriThree Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri after only a few minutes becomes  a story of real  people living their  anger, pain, loss, illness, and even dark  humor  before our eyes.    In fact, the audience shares in their reactions  as we are also  called to view these emotions and events through our own experiences.  How sympathetic  and empathetic am I to others pain and grief?

Martin McDonagh’s award winning screenplay is tightly written with quick retorts and insight even  from  raised eye brows and quick smirks.  His writing has not a word to waste like the playwright he is.  In fact, I decided to see the film because McDonagh wrote In Bruges  one of my favorite films from years past which has  great character development in the story  of Irish hit men.  Collin Farrell was in his best role and performance and I think that happened because he was allowed…

View original post 251 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment